Two inmates who sued for the right to marry while in prison won their case Friday before a federal judge.
The ACLU represented Paul Gillpatrick and Niccole Wetherell, Nebraskans who have been engaged for seven years and are incarcerated in state prisons.
The case has bounced around the court system, and this might not be the final word.
Suzanne Gage, spokeswoman for the Nebraska attorney general, said Friday evening: “We are reviewing the decision.”
Gillpatrick and Wetherell met before going to prison. He is in the State Penitentiary in Lincoln, and she is in the Nebraska Correctional Center for Women in York.
Sign up for World-Herald news alerts
Be the first to know when news happens. Get the latest breaking headlines sent straight to your inbox.
Gillpatrick was sentenced to 55 to 90 years in the 2009 slaying of Robby Robinson, a former Omaha firefighter. Wetherell was one of three people sentenced to life in prison for her role in the 1998 stabbing death of Scott Catenacci in Bellevue’s Haworth Park.
The couple then fought their case in federal court in Nebraska, where U.S. District Judge Robert Rossiter ruled in their favor Friday.
Nebraska Department of Corrections officials had argued that the couple couldn’t marry because state law calls for them to be “in the presence of a magistrate or minister and the attending witnesses,” which they argued requires the participants’ physical presence.
A dispute also existed over whether a change in state prison policy, adopted after the couple sued, could hold up.
The policy change of 2016 said inmates “will normally not be permitted to marry other inmates due to potential risks to safety, security or good order ...”
Wetherell and Gillpatrick said they understood that they couldn’t be transported from their prisons for the wedding. They asked that they be married by phone and later requested a wedding by Skype or other videoconference technology.
The corrections officials argued again in federal court that state law required the couple’s physical presence at the wedding.
The couple declared in federal court that the policies being used against them violate their constitutional right to marry. Rossiter’s ruling said that in earlier cases, judges have found that inmates “do not forfeit that right simply because they are incarcerated.”
And the concern in the 2016 policy does not apply, the ruling said, because the proposed “e-wedding” doesn’t threaten the security, order or resources of the Corrections Department.
The judgment said denial of the wedding by video “is unreasonable here.”